Wednesday, August 18, 2010

SAP - A Humble Giant From The Reality Land? Part 5: Challenges and User Recommendations

Event Summary

During its international e-business conference, SAPPHIRE, on June 12-15, SAP AG (NYSE: SAP), the leading provider of business software solutions, released a spate of upbeat announcements in its effort to portray itself as a reformed vendor of choice for all aspects of e-Business, including planning and collaboration. As an illustration thereof, SAP cited that its flagship mySAP.com suite has met with remarkable success in the market. SAP reached a major milestone in 2000 when the number of licensed users of its mySAP.com platform reached 1 million. Since then, more than 3 million additional users have reportedly licensed mySAP.com.

About This Note: This is a five-part note covering the announcements at the SAPPHIRE conference.

Part One covered Alliances and Partnerships
Part Two covered Expanding Functionality
Part Three discussed Market Impact
Part Four discussed SAP Strategy
Part Five covers the challenges faced by SAP and User Recommendations,

Challenges

Delivering on this extremely ambitious strategy will be an enormous challenge. Although SAP has done a remarkable job of demystifying the mySAP.com conundrum, there will still be confusion as prospects might be overwhelmed with all the new products and unfamiliar terminology.

It appears that SAP's recent revenue growth is attributable to its market recognition, large customer base, and to risk-averse customers' unwillingness to go for less viable vendors, rather than to SAP's immaculate marketing effort. Moreover, SAP's sales force will not only have to learn how to sell the products but also whom to target within a prospect's organization with every piece of software.

The fact remains that many new SAP modules are quite cross-functional, while some may even require the creation of new roles within an enterprise (e.g., a VP of new product introduction (NPI)). One should also account for the ongoing costs of cross training the SAP consulting force on new and still developing e-business applications from its traditional ERP functional orientation. The same holds for the sales force that has been reorganized around vertical industries in respective CRM, SCM, business intelligence and other product areas.

Another caveat is that as a result of the changes within the company, a significant part of the SAP US-based workforce has been with the company for only a year of less. The challenge for SAP is to get enough experienced people who can sell point solutions CRM, SCM, PLM, e-procurement, etc, both within the realm of SAP and as stand-alone components that can be integrated with other products. Since the longer term SAP sales people are accustomed to selling the monolithic ERP SAP product, 'the whole enchilada', contracts and /or upgrades rather than selling CRM, SCM and PLM point products, it will take time for them to be retrained or cross-trained to sell the new components. The result is when it comes to the new components, the entire sales force is still learning. The lack of experienced sales resources in these new areas may impede SAP's proficiency in selling these products outside of its install base.

The Key is Execution

Therefore, SAP's potentially unwieldy and scattered global development organization, disparate product components and their developments' coordination, and the lack of sales focus may hamper the execution of its otherwise attractive strategy.

SAP should clearly articulate the delivery milestones of its recently announced e-business strategy. These should address time frames for all main product lines releases, and also, how customers can feasibly migrate piecemeal from individual components to the integrated whole. SAP R/3 Enterprise, the next major release of its flagship ERP suite, which is slated for general availability in 2Q 2002, and which will supposedly provide an R/3-based kernel of horizontal components, upon which customers can incrementally deploy new mySAP.com and 3rd-party components without the need to update their core ERP systems, is the step in the right direction, but with the long way to go. Also, although SAP Web Application Server (SAP Web AS), which is an incarnation of SAP Basis as the underlying technology for most of SAP's solutions, should enable new Internet paradigms to be combined with the transactional operations of ERP, it will also require significant mindset change and retraining of former ABAP programmers into e.g., HTTP or JavaScript.

While SAP seems to have finally realized that it would unlikely be the sole application provider within a single enterprise and that, for it to provide more value to its customers, it must be more open with its competitors, some reservations in the market about its sincere intentions will remain. Partnerships have been ephemeral, however, and remain effective only as long as the partners have common interests. Any partner's commitment to SAP is certainly not unique. However, SAP relationships with Commerce One and IBM do seem to have merits and should remain solid and produce results for both partners for some time to come.



SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/sap-a-humble-giant-from-the-reality-land-part-5-challenges-and-user-recommendations-16439/

Sagent Improves Its Image With SAS Partnership

Event Summary

Business intelligence and data warehousing software vendor Sagent (NASDAQ: SGNT) has announced a strategic agreement with SAS Institute (the largest privately held software company in the world), a strong presence in e-intelligence, data mining and data warehousing, and best known for its statistical software. Under the agreement, Sagent will integrate and license select SAS analytic and customer relationship management (CRM) software within its business intelligence solutions. The target market for these SAS-enhanced offerings from Sagent will be the mid-market (generally defined as companies with revenues up to $750 million). That market will include sectors such as credit unions, community banks, and select property and casualty insurance companies, among others.

As a result of this agreement, Sagent will offer SAS' world-renowned data mining and CRM software as part of its business intelligence solution. "SAS' credibility in the marketplace, as well as its broad and deep analytic and e-intelligence offerings, made it the clear choice as a partner and a provider of analytics and CRM solutions to integrate with Sagent's existing offerings," said Bob Flynn, senior vice president, marketing and strategy, Sagent. "We are pleased that SAS and Sagent have agreed to work together on this important initiative."

Market Impact

One of SAS Institute's biggest problems has been its lack of visibility and name recognition beyond Global 2000 companies. The majority of business professionals have worked with SAS software at some point in their career, but usually aren't exactly sure what SAS does as a company. The agreement with Sagent supports SAS' objective of developing additional channels for sales and distribution to accelerate revenue growth and increase market presence by reaching market sectors that it has not traditionally served. SAS has stated that they will continue to focus the efforts of its direct sales force on expanding its presence among large enterprise customers.

According to Graeme Woodley, SAS' senior vice president for business development and channel operations, "Sagent has a proven track record of providing business intelligence and data warehousing solutions to mid-markets, enabling their customers to streamline operations and improve decision-making. Our agreement with Sagent brings powerful SAS analytical solutions to the vertical mid-markets served by Sagent." The agreement between SAS and Sagent covers the Americas and Europe, and includes development assistance for the integration of SAS Enterprise Miner and other software, as well as training for the Sagent sales force in the positioning of the new combined offerings. The integrated offerings are scheduled for release in the first half of 2001.



SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/sagent-improves-its-image-with-sas-partnership-16355/

The Challenges that Remain for One Aspiring Global Sourcing Vendor

Despite Eqos's encouraging growth, increasing momentum, cumulative savvy, and indisputable experience as a provider of global sourcing and supplier management solutions for the retail supply chain worldwide (please see the previous parts of this series: One Vendor's Quest to Garner a Global Sourcing Ecosystem, A Retail Sourcing Suite Built on Experience, The Secret of One Vendor's Success in the Retail Supply Chain, and How One Sourcing Vendor's Offerings Are Bolstered by a Wealth of Services), it would be shortsighted not to acknowledge the challenges that still loom on the horizon for Eqos (www.eqos.com).

Eqos is, after all, still an up-and-coming company with a blossoming client roster (especially outside the UK), and with many product enhancements and improvements yet to be developed and launched. As such, the vendor still lacks global name recognition. Thus, many of the first few “proof of concept” customers came from the UK market.

As for penetrating the US market, fierce competition has already come from TradeStone Software (see A Well-designed Solution for Sourcing: Its Technological Foundation and How It Works). Like Eqos's solution, the TradeStone Suite is also a scalable, multitiered, server-based enterprise application built on the standards-based Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) development model, with support for Web services and extensible markup language (XML) that is leveraged for integrations (see Understand J2EE and .NET Environments Before You Choose.)

The two vendors' offerings and aspirations appear to be similar, with each vendor sometimes being “accused” of copycatting the other's messages and offerings. Yet in their efforts to keep up with each other, the companies are in fact validating each other, as well as the market in general. However, the companies are approaching the market from different perspectives. While Tradestone is a relatively new software company, Eqos has evolved from its heritage as a consulting company with a collaborative platform into a provider of standard application service provider (ASP) hosted solutions.

The issue of expanding the footprint occurs because of the intricacy of global trade and international logistics—an intricacy that stems from having to involve so many parties or intermediaries and their accompanying processes. Namely, buyers, foreign sourcing offices, and agents that have to deal with targeted suppliers (contract manufacturers) in terms of bidding processes, contract negotiations, product sampling, quality and safety, the tracking of advanced shipping notices (ASNs), shipment status, regulatory compliance, financial settlements, supplier scorecards, bid comparisons, and so on, is only one part of the entire process.

But what about the other accompanying processes involved with compliance and testing partners, local and international third party logistics (3PLs), customs, financial institutions, distribution centers (DCs), individual stores, and so on? Accommodating and enabling freight forwarders, non-vessel operating common carriers (NVOCCs), consolidators, customs house brokers, export management companies (EMCs) and export trading companies (ETCs), shipping associations, shipping brokers, shipping agents, export packaging companies, etc. further complicates the picture. For more information, please refer to APICS Certified Supply Chain Professional (CSCP) Learning System, Module 2: Building Competitive Operations, Planning and Logistics, 2007.

Also, the market in which all global sourcing vendors operate is characterized by early adopters, and it is rapidly evolving. A company of Eqos's current stature and means will be challenged to maintain its competitive position against competitors having significantly greater financial resources, name recognition, and other resources. The market is highly fragmented, and the intensity of competition can be expected to increase in the future, where competition might come from in-house development efforts, consulting companies, other software companies, financial institutions, logistic companies, customs brokers, forwarders, and third party development efforts.

As user companies continue to embrace the value of broader sourcing and global trade management (GTM) solutions, software vendors will often be looked upon to provide leadership and to add more value to the entire order life cycle, including purchase order management, total landed cost modeling, insurance and claims, import and export compliance, security regulations, and more seamless integration with invoice reconciliation and trade financing systems.

Given user companies' awareness of their need for GTM solutions and the like, there is a plethora of point solution providers that specialize in narrow areas of this growing yet fragmented market. Such areas range from landed cost calculation, retail product lifecycle management (PLM), visibility and event management, collaboration, export compliance, trading document generation, hazardous material handling, supply chain and production planning (see Production Planning and Scheduling Software for the Textile Industry: Unknown Frontiers), lead times, pricing or inventory optimization, and distribution order management (DOM), to more complete transportation management capabilities—just enough to muddle the message and nibble at the potential revenues of full-fledged retail sourcing players. For a slew of potential competitors in the market, see Challenges and User Recommendations for a Global Trading Solutions Provider on a Roll.

Eqos would likely point confidently to its focus on supermarkets and hard-goods and soft-goods retailers, its happy customer references, and the comprehensiveness of its solution, complete with business process management (BPM) and business intelligence (BI) enablement. However, even if not as well-versed and successful as Eqos is in these areas, some of the larger market players will likely be able to creep into a number of enterprises and reduce the share of the Eqos's account dollars.

While generalist sourcing vendors like Ariba and Perfect Commerce might not have the retail expertise per se, they might still cause the slowdown or postponement of some executive decisions. Additionally, given SAP's recent ecosystem push to recruit the “SAP Powered by NetWeaver” and “SAP Certified by NetWeaver” partners (see Multipurpose SAP NetWeaver), it might not take long before the giant partners up (or eventually acquires) with some of the above providers, thus creating a barrier of entry for Eqos and its contemporaries to its vast install base. The same could only be expected from Oracle given its recent appetite for acquisitions and for rolling them into the Oracle Fusion platform. And let's not forget the retail industry incumbent JDA Software of i2 Technologies.

Furthermore, given Eqos's needs and its intentions to broaden its channel abroad and to tackle industries beyond retail (for example, consumer packaged goods [CPG], consumer electronics, or pharmaceutical manufacturers), the vendor might end up with double the amount of investment (expenses) and additional competition from these markets' incumbents.

Turning Challenges into Opportunities

Eqos's strategy, based on its current state of affairs, is to first deliver an expanded solution footprint (Eqos Global Sourcing & PLM) by leveraging its existing assets and continuing with operational excellence. The vendor is also exploring potential alliance partners, and it is working on promoting the on demand-software as a service (SaaS) business model (for more information, please see Software as a Service's Functional Catch-up).

Following this, the long-term goal is to reach a “sourcing-as-a-service,” game-changing initiative by offering the expanded solution value via content partners and “on-the-ground” service partners.
Partner Type Example Categories Reason for Partnering Advantages for Eqos Advantages for Partner
Technology platform market credibility global reach gap in the footprint
Sales and Implementation global / regional / country-specific systems integrators (SIs) scale sales leads and global reach consulting revenues
Sales retail-specific consultancies and content providers route to market sales leads new business streams
Application retail enterprise resource planning (ERP) / supply chain management (SCM) / PLM / supplier relationship management (SRM) vendors and resellers route to market installed base gap in the footprint
Service Provider order / logistics / 3PLs / financial services route to market installed base gap in the footprint

Table 1. Eqos's alliance strategy and value proposition

To that end, Eqos has been occupied lately with devising a sound alliance program and strategy in terms of goals, revenues, markets, and channels. The strategy seems to be doing well within the initial phase of identifying target geographic regions (the UK, the US, continental Europe, and the rest of the world) and channels as well as the types of partners (see Table 1). Only time will tell how well Eqos will execute the subsequent phases of recruiting the partners, striking the mutual commitment (to the agreements with spelled-out roles and responsibilities, commitment levels, marketing plans, etc.), and pursuing the joint engagement developments and joint support programs (in terms of education, training, Web-based support, incentives, ongoing relationship management, etc.).

User Recommendations

As retail and manufacturing enterprises, in their quest for lower item costs, move their production or continue to source from remote places throughout the world, complexity is inevitably introduced into the supply chain, which often results in bloated, multi-echelon inventories or lower customer service levels (higher stockouts). Companies that need to manage the intricate details of moving their goods across borders (such as trade financing, regulatory compliance, accompanying detailed documents, harmonized tariff schedule [HTS] coding, multimodal carrier handling, brokers management, etc.) might want to look for a full-fledged global sourcing system that is also well-attuned for their particular industry.

Since the Internet has become a commonly used medium for managing such complexity in near real time, enterprises should try to take advantage of sophisticated sourcing tools and processes to share and respond to once-complex scenarios in real time. The idea is to optimize around the unexpected events by becoming more responsive, as the expected ones become the exception rather than the rule.

Since the potential advantages of global sourcing are often hampered by increased supply chain complexity and bloated lead times, prospective companies should investigate the way global sourcing and supplier management tools and practices, like those from Eqos, could help them to enable their supply network flexibility, visibility, and rapid reaction process. Visibility typically has a direct correlation on perfect order fill rate, which ultimately affects margin and profit. The way to fight price pressures and shrinking margins is not always to go for the cheapest remote suppliers, but rather to focus on quality and turnaround time. Sourcing and supplier management processes based on best industry practices should also help retailers with balancing cost, flexibility, speed, and risk in their sourcing strategies.

Being service-oriented architecture (SOA)-based, Eqos's solution allows buyers to build on the infrastructure they already have in place rather than have to deploy a complex new system that most likely has at least some level of duplicate functionality. This system's openness should be used by retail channel masters to court the best trading partners. However, achieving an efficient online supplier management system is a considerable undertaking, and prospective customers should make sure their own “houses are in order” before trying to open up their systems to others in the supply chain and harness open standards.

In addition to overcoming the usual political and cultural issues (such as the onboarding of suppliers, issues of ownership, and trust and competitive privacy issues), there are a number of other issues that need to be tackled, as suppliers are called upon to share sensitive information. In addition to existing, rigid technology standards for exchanging information electronically (although the XML-based systems like Eqos can help here), there are issues concerning the way business processes have long been handled in different companies. Without common standards for information exchange and process integration, smaller companies face sizeable costs if they seek to comply with the online supply chain demands of each of their large retail customers. The malleable BPM-based solutions from retail sourcing providers like Eqos can go a long way toward mitigating these conundrums.






SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/the-challenges-that-remain-for-one-aspiring-global-sourcing-vendor-19136/

PeopleSoft: Giving Fervent Hope To The Market And Jitters To The Competition. Part 2: The Implications

Event Summary

PeopleSoft is seeking to make bigger strides in the CRM, SCM and B2B software markets with its recent spate of product releases. The rhetoric and hype aside, the fact is that PeopleSoft has become a fearsome enterprise applications provider. PeopleSoft has joined the elite group of vendors that can deliver a majority of the components of a complete e-business framework. If one considers all aspects of a CRM or SCM evaluation, PeopleSoft has earned the license to be evaluated along with market leaders. Possibly more encouraging is PeopleSoft's upbeat prediction for the rest of the year, optimism only a few of its competitors can currently exhibit.

While Wall Street praises the vendor's new product initiatives and its strong first quarter results and optimism for the future, its direct competitors are far from feeling easy.

About this Article: This is a two part note, Part One covered the news from PeopleSoft about new products and its first Quarter results. This part discusses the Market Impact of this news and how it affects Users.

Market Impact

The rhetoric and hype ("pure Internet technology" that has "no code on the client" and allows "universal access from any Web device, anywhere in the world, at any time", also with "embedded analytics", etc.) aside, the fact is that PeopleSoft has become a fearsome enterprise applications provider. The new products and partnerships give the company an exciting look. Even with well-known caveats about product immaturity, PeopleSoft has officially joined the elite in the CRM, SCM and eBusiness battlefields. Additionally, its results present a ray of hope for the market in these otherwise dismal times that have seen many software vendors disappear, downgrade earnings, or otherwise struggle. Possibly more encouraging is PeopleSoft's upbeat prediction for the rest of the year, optimism only a few of its competitors can currently exhibit.

PeopleSoft has expanded much beyond its kernel Human Resource (HR) applications, with a broad product portfolio that might sell well in a number of geographic areas and/or industries. But PeopleSoft did not abandon its HR roots either. The purchase of SkillsVillage proves that PeopleSoft is still quite committed to the workforce management market. PeopleSoft has thereby upped the ante in the HR market, primarily for SAP, Oracle and J.D. Edwards, although the move has only slightly surpassed Lawson Software's e-Recruiting Services (formerly ijob) functionality.

The move might also promote PeopleSoft into the leadership position within the services procurement market, which was quite neglected in the past, as attention was traditionally focused on material goods procurement. This is not necessarily the case any more as companies look to apply similar principles of automation and savings to services procurement. But, the greatest value may likely be in integrating SkillsVillage with a slew of other PeopleSoft applications, like e-procurement, professional services automation (PSA), and e-payment.

The Positive Implications

With its spate of new products, PeopleSoft joins the elite group of vendors that can deliver a majority of the components of a complete e-business framework. The PeopleSoft 8 suite includes CRM, SCM, professional service automation (PSA), data warehousing, e-procurement applications, business intelligence (analytics), on top of traditional ERP applications. Moreover, in some instances, PeopleSoft may be able to offer the best of both worlds (one-stop shop and best-of-breed). In addition to the leading HRMS product, the company's pervasive Business Intelligence (Analytics) components, with dedicated complex analysis and reporting around almost all crucial business areas including new CRM components, is quite impressive.

PeopleSoft was one of the first major enterprise application vendors to deliver an analytic product with its Enterprise Performance Management (EPM). However, PeopleSoft does not yet support predictive data mining, needed for behavior modeling and prediction or for targeting and segmentation to drive campaigns, and has only partially embedded the analytics into the major CRM business processes, which are part and parcel of leading CRM products.

PeopleSoft, however, is not breaking much new ground with these new products. PeopleSoft 8 CRM exhibits strong service and support (call center) functionality (a result of Vantive expertise), but only basic marketing and sales force automation (SFA) modules. There is also ample room for improvement of the following components: pervasive wireless connectivity, content management, partner relationship management (PRM), multi-channel service escalation, interactive selling system (ISS), and vertical solutions/templates. Most of these developments are slated for the end of the year according to the company's officials.

The functionality of the PeopleSoft 8 CRM product suite has not yet matched the breadth and depth of CRM pure players (e.g., Siebel, Onyx, etc.), PeopleSoft's (as well as SAP's and Oracle's for that matter) huge potential advantage is the integration of its CRM, SCM and eBusiness products to its back-office ERP systems that handle the vital internal processes so important to customers. The new system should potentially allow manufacturers to get a 360-degree view of all their customer relationships. This kind of knowledge only comes from integrating CRM software with back-office systems. Additional advantages of the PeopleSoft 8 CRM product are its alleged interconnectivity to other third-party ERP systems as well as improved scalability (the company claims to be the first vendor to support 30,000 CRM users).

Also, supplier-facing applications have long been a strength of PeopleSoft, with a sizable customer base. PeopleSoft 8 SRM is designed to help organizations effectively evaluate the strategic value of their suppliers and leverage their relationships accordingly. It is envisioned to integrate the design, sourcing, procurement, manufacturing and replenishment processes within a company. Since the solution offers an array of both direct and indirect materials procurement processes, it might provide PeopleSoft with the opportunity to sell its SCM products into some non-manufacturing industries such as healthcare, telecommunications and utilities, where it already has a large user base.

Furthermore, integration of SCM and CRM products should result in a convergence of these traditionally disconnected business processes (e.g., campaign-to-order, order-to-cash, service-to-profit, design-to-acceptance, plan-to-service, request-to-resolve, agreement-to-profit, etc.) through information at every channel across the expanded enterprise. To enable effective collaborative commerce, PeopleSoft has delivered role-based portals that encompass business applications, transactional data, workflow and analytics to make employees more productive.

The Downside of Product Expansion

The downside of this product expansion is the resulting attention and retaliatory actions of a wider number of formidable competitors. While PeopleSoft now has strong management with an invigorated stance, and is running a profitable business with a good control of its financial, sales, and marketing activities, it may be short-lived without sustaining license revenue.

Although a broader product range should provide more revenue, one should bear in mind that PeopleSoft's license revenue in 2000 was still 25% less than the corresponding revenue in 1998, back when the company was only a mere ERP provider. PeopleSoft still has lower license revenue (expressed both as a percentage of total revenue and in raw dollar amounts), market share, global presence, and resources compared to SAP, Oracle and, in part, Siebel Systems and i2 Technologies. Also, the great part of its revenue comes from its existing customer base (almost 50% of PeopleSoft's existing customers have reportedly upgraded to the new product), while the rest may be reluctant to jump on a heavily involved product upgrade both because of current economic conditions and because of their contentment with the current product release in use. On the other hand, potential users that might be attracted to the new release, may postpone the software acquisition until the economic conditions improve.

One is also to expect the likes of Siebel to counterattack by going after users of Vantive products, particularly those that do not run on PeopleSoft back office given that switching to PeopleSoft's next generation product would require spending more money and tinkering with the systems anyway. In case that PeopleSoft CRM 8 does not offer significant new functionality, current Vantive users may opt to switch to a deeper and broader leading CRM product (or only a component thereof).

While the methodology, toolset and packaged services to assist customers in migrations from Vantive to the new PeopleSoft 8 CRM platform, which are scheduled for the release in July, are a step in the right direction, they do not address integrations Vantive customers might have made to other systems, such as other ERP systems or Computer Telephony Integration (CTI) and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) functionality. The tools are designed to examine an existing Vantive implementation, determining where customization has occurred and mapping existing business rules and data to the new system. Also, current Vantive users may not appreciate the need to convert to PeopleSoft's value-based pricing model that charges based on the number of modules and the size of the company, which is a departure from the user-based pricing Vantive had originally used.

PeopleSoft will use Internet-based product architecture, analytics, and integration with its own back-office and/or the openness to other products/platforms to snatch a bigger market share in the CRM market. While its product might currently be more Internet-based than those of other leading enterprise application vendors, it holds some caveats too. Some competitors cite that PeopleSoft is trying to present virtue out of necessity (in other words, to go for only HTML interface as the easiest way out of outdated fat-client two-tier architecture it had belatedly abandoned). In fact, PeopleSoft's decision to offer only an Internet browser look-and-feel interface has even, in some instances, initially met the power-user resistance or a displeasure for not being able to choose between many options.

Customers also prefer more gradual and, therefore, less painful, transition from their current client/server based systems, and may consider PeopleSoft's new product release as a steep technology leap. While the HTML-like interfaces are perfect for casual and task-specific users with a minimum training requirements, power-users may still prefer the functionality and drill-around capability of Windows-like user interfaces (drop-down menus, right-click feature, etc.).

Some early PeopleSoft 8 power-users cited the awkwardness of conducting more complex transactions only via hyperlinks and through jumping to and fro a number of screens, which defeats the purpose of simplicity. In that regard, the competitors' Web-enabled user interfaces that either still contain many Windows features or offer different interfaces for casual and power users, may be the better approach at this stage. As a remedy, PeopleSoft had to turn to proprietary technology called PowerHTML that enables the use of hot keys in a browser to reduce navigation time. Also, the zero footprint client does not lend itself to disconnected mobile computing. PeopleSoft will have to provide a solution to enable mobile users (salespeople) to use the system without the mandatory need for Web connections, which is a key issue for sales force automation (SFA).

The Challenge

PeopleSoft's major challenge remains in further increasing the marketing awareness, promoting its new image, products, and the Internet architecture as well as in crisp sales execution. The success of the PeopleSoft 8 product portfolio may be difficult for the company to manage in the near future. PeopleSoft needs to keep the ball rolling by providing efficient and knowledgeable sales and services teams that can articulate the vision and provide the expected value to customers. Therefore, while PeopleSoft should continue to focus on enhancing its products on time, it should also ensure stringent training of its sales and customer support forces, and partners as the spotlight is only going to intensify.

Like SAP, Oracle and Baan, PeopleSoft will preach the power of integration with the back-office to downplay their current inferiority in feature-function battle against the CRM or SCM specialist vendors. Except for Oracle that remains adamant on its unitary one-stop-shop mantra, the other vendors can also tout strength to support integration with other vendors or legacy systems on a wide range of platforms. The fact that most of leading ERP vendors have delivered CRM and SCM modules integrated with their back-office systems (although not the cutting edge functionality), and a tamed growth of the CRM market recently, might force the likes of Siebel or i2 to finally get out of their complacent mindset and to start considering acquisition of an ERP vendor or at least the provision of an interconnectivity of their modules.

In addition to ERP giants battles against best-of-breed vendors, look for particularly fierce intra-market duels between SAP, Oracle and PeopleSoft owing to the closeness of the companies' product offering. The technological advantage that PeopleSoft currently has in terms of the pure Internet architecture may not last for long. On the other hand, SAP's and/or Oracle's advantage due to larger market recognition and resources, broader product foothold and better international presence may be diminished by PeopleSoft's new product release. Every selection war will be won by mere nuances. The use of a statistically valid decision-making tool and careful discernment of importance (weight) factors for all selection criteria will be of paramount importance (see Knowledge Based Selections). When more than one vendor ranks well within a given set of areas (as is very likely in the case of the above vendors), the decision hierarchy provides the supporting material required to justify the rationale of the final decision.




SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/peoplesoft-giving-fervent-hope-to-the-market-and-jitters-to-the-competition-part-2-the-implications-16408/

From Shoestring Budget to Millions: The Road Ahead for an Enterprise Management Software Vendor

Challenges and Opportunities

Run for over two decades under the stewardship of the deLaski father-son team, Deltek Systems, Inc. has become North America's principal provider of enterprise software and solutions for project-focused organizations. In mid-2005, Deltek announced that New Mountain Partners II, L.P. would make a majority capital investment in the company. See Mountainous Investment Transforms Enterprise Management Software Vendor and Enterprise Management Software Vendor Welcomes Additions for more information about this investment and its implications. This move, while certainly enhancing Deltek's prospects in terms of strengthening its global position, should not deflect attention from their already impressive offering (see Sweet Spots and What-Nots: Enterprise Management Software Vendor Provides Notable Solutions). But the road ahead presents its own particular challenges and opportunities.

Part Four of the series Mountainous Investment Transforms Enterprise Management Software Vendor.

Thanks to its internal developments and acquisitions, Deltek currently boasts more than 11,000 customers worldwide, and 1,000 employees in 14 locations in the US, Canada, and the UK. The vendor has long since established its strategy with respect to its large installed customer base:

* to maintain and strengthen relationships with the existing customers by providing ongoing support services;
* to derive additional revenues by migrating clients to more advanced products within its product line, licensing add-on application software products, and offering its customers additional consulting and training services; and
* to target existing customers for front-office add-on solutions such as Deltek CRM & Proposals, Deltek Time Collection, Deltek Employee Expense, Deltek GovWin, Deltek BPM, and Deltek Employee Self-Service.

However, based on strong recent execution, tried-and-true alliances, and its "trusted specialist" and niche leadership auras in targeted project-oriented vertical markets, as well as its new management and infusion of capital, Deltek has recently been working to harness its indisputable differentiators, in order to move into new markets and position itself for continued growth. Since its inception, the company's product line has expanded from applications for managing core back-office processes, to front-office and e-business processes for professional services and other project-based companies, many of which provide products and services beyond the realm of federal government contracts. However, room for expansion remains, in certain areas. But these opportunities (although some of them may be low-hanging-apple easy pickings), will also present the upbeat vendor with challenges, if only because of the difficulties involved in sailing uncharted territories.

Geographic expansion into Canada, the UK, and Australia seems the most feasible option in the short term, given that they are English-speaking regions, and also given Deltek's ongoing effort to incrementally internationalize its product portfolio beyond the Costpoint, Vision, and T&E products. One should keep in mind, however, that in many Deltek markets, particularly in the federal government sector, its customers are inherently focused on the US, and will likely remain so. Therefore, multicompany and multilanguage features have only recently been introduced within the Costpoint 5 release (and Vision 3 release), which has likely meant many missed opportunities in the past—and possibly in the future while these immature features gain some traction. Despite some international clients (including pharmaceutical company Kendle International [Germany] and General Dynamics [Saudi Arabia]), Deltek has thus far achieved an only limited presence in international markets, which is a weakness compared to the global capabilities of competitors such as Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, Epicor Software, and Exact Software (see Global Software Aspirations).

Deltek's international business strategy is being energetically refocused, from opportunistically targeting potential user organizations, to marketing and selling its solutions through value-added reseller (VAR) channels. For one thing, it always helps to have an expert third party certify the best practices and value proposition of the enterprise solution, especially for those that require, even for occasional users, a thorough education with respect to concepts and lingo (as is the case with regulatory and reporting compliance in many project-based businesses). For another thing, VARs might be more savvy about meeting the integration or customization requirements of certain customers; as a rule, in certain industries and regions (such as the Asia Pacific), software vendors have to side with local resellers and integrators, or else face an insurmountable cultural and financial barrier to market entry. Furthermore, although Deltek's reputation for high quality service and support, and its ability to work directly with customers, along with its ability to provide reasonably rapid implementations, have all constituted competitive advantages to date, its primarily direct sales approach might not be the most appropriate for the lower end of the mid-market. VARs understand professional services prospective customers, simply because they are in the same type of business as their prospects, and in this context, the likes of Microsoft, Epicor, Exact, and Sage Software have an undeniable advantage. For more information, see The Cha(lle)nging World of Value-Added Resellers.

Despite having 600 international customers in 25 countries, Deltek has yet to show that its strategy and technology can consistently "travel abroad," especially to Europe, where it has to sow many more seeds than it has, if it is to fulfill its global ambitions. There is certainly no debate about the company's current lack of significant international presence, since a significantly smaller portion of its total revenues comes from sales outside North America. This is despite the fact that the company launched its international push nearly a decade ago, with the establishment of a direct UK presence; but there, it has had limited success. This kind of profile flies in the face of the accepted economics of the packaged software market, whereby a vendor of Deltek's size should have at least a third of revenues flowing from outside its domestic market. The vendor admits to not having put previous focus in international expansion, as instead its focus was on the US. Now, it believes itself ready to expand strategically, and for 2006 and beyond this expansion has become a key priority for Deltek and the executive team. The vendor now has leadership and executives with the proven international experience to map a much stronger international strategy. Also, Welcom's portfolio adds complex international capabilities to its earned value management (EVM) and project portfolio management (PPM) suites. Government mandates for EVM (that is, mandates for the Department of Defense [DoD], the Department of Energy [DoE], and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in the US, and similar mandates for the UK's Ministry of Defense [MoD]) make this additional functionality a critical addition to Deltek's portfolio, given its client base as well as its goal of international expansion.

The company will also have to support and nurture its relationship with existing overseas clients in markets such as Europe, the Middle East, India, Australia and New Zealand, the Philippines, and South Africa, where it needs a local partner that can offer responsive customer support and knowledge about relevant laws and tax regulations. But the challenges of international expansion go far beyond product localization, which alone is an overwhelming challenge. Deltek will also have to invest sizeable financial, time, and human resources in order to prospect and identify an optimal internationalization roadmap, and then find, ally with, and manage appropriate channel partners (including during the typical fits and starts of the ramp-up phase). Additionally, the vendor will have to finance the necessary marketing and product and independent software vendor (ISV) technology alliance campaigns, which need to be well-attuned to the regions it decides to target, while ensuring that its own presence expands where applicable and without conflicts.

Bundled with the international channel push is the need to significantly expand its previously skimpy marketing budget (and mindset), which is of a strategic nature. This concept is opposed to Deltek's previous industry-specific targeted marketing (and word-of-mouth tactics within the Washington, DC [US] "beltway"). This is all necessary if the vendor is going to enhance its brand name and value proposition (the concept of selected project-based industries and their exacting needs) towards a greater, more global scale of presence and recognition. In addition to more purposeful and encompassing multichannel lead generation activities (see The Web-enabled Sales Process), alignment of the vendor message with alliances and a channel will require a sizable budget for more comprehensive marketing activities. Steps in the right direction include a whopping increase in the 2006 marketing budget over 2005 (so as to accommodate some 2006 events, including strategic hires in the marketing department, the re-branding effort, record user conference attendance, and so forth), and increased and planned growth in the direct sales force. However, the associated costs of hiring the right personnel, as well as a related increase in the marketing budget, will have to be handled carefully in order not to displease New Mountain, which might see its payback from Deltek coming at a slower pace than initially envisioned. This is certainly not the case now, since the company's business plan remains and has remained consistent and on track, and the progress has thus far been "above plan."

Tackling Earned Value Management and Project Portfolio Management

With new finances, Deltek certainly plans to continue its quest to build complete project solutions, from award to audit, via both internal development and acquisitions. As for future developments of Deltek Enterprise (Deltek Costpoint), in addition to ongoing Web enablement of key business processes, and delivery of control and reporting documentation related to the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), major new "order winning" capabilities will include EVM and PPM. For more on achieving SOX compliance, see Using Business Intelligence Infrastructure to Ensure Compliancy with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Joining the Sarbanes-Oxley Bandwagon; Meeting the Needs of Small and Medium Businesses. While EVM is meant to be added to both Deltek Costpoint and GCS Premier (but not to Deltek Vision, which already has the capability), PPM modules such as portfolio management, risk management, project scheduling, project analytics, and so on, are currently planned for Costpoint, although the intent, strategy, and actual product set allows for integration to any back-office solution.

More Opportunities and Challenges While the Deltek strategy to shore up its current install base and to target new related markets has been sound to date, one should never discount fierce competition as a factor, given that the market for enterprise application software has become highly competitive and dynamic. Deltek products are targeted toward a wide range of project-oriented organizations, and the competition varies depending on customer size, industry, and specific system requirements.

For larger implementations of enterprise-wide products, the principal competitors include Oracle (including former PeopleSoft and JD Edwards), Lawson Software, CODA, Unit 4 Agresso, and, inevitably, SAP. For smaller implementations of enterprise-wide products, competitors include Microsoft Business Solutions (especially when augmented by partner solutions for Microsoft Dynamics SL and Microsoft Dynamics GP [formerly Microsoft Great Plains]), Intuit, MYOB, Exact, Epicor, and Sage. Although many of the above vendors have not really competed regularly with Deltek so far, this will not necessarily be the case in the future, given Deltek's expansion aspirations.

There are also many other players which offer industry-specific products, such as (in the architectural, engineering, and construction [A/E/C] sector) Constructware, BST Consultants, and Axium, with some nifty features such as an electronic stopwatch for time collection, spread among several projects; and built-in warning systems when project is over budget (although Deltek Vision has this functionality, which will be released in version 4.1) or when the firm is going to overpay a subcontractor. Furthermore, Deltek Time Collection competes with electronic timekeeping systems offered by vendors such as Kronos, ADP, Ceridian, and Kaba Benzing. Its newly acquired Welcom applications face competition from such well-known companies as Microsoft Project, Primavera, Business Engines, Dekker, C/S Solutions, Artemis, Mantix, Integrated Management Concepts (IMC), and so on.

As the nonprofit sector requires automated allocation to support multiple funding sources under one project for billing and revenue recognition (which is traditionally done via manual calculations or custom programming within generic accounting solutions), Deltek has long supported multiple-source funding capabilities. The vendor has a nonprofit accounting product coming out later in 2006, which will target grant-based, or (as designated in the US) "A-133" nonprofit organizations. This product will be an affordable grant-based financial management system for small to medium nonprofit firms, which is a fairly sizable market in the US, contested by leaders like Blackbaud, Sage, Serenic Corporation, Intuit, Microsoft, Kintera, ASP eTapestry, and so on (see Nonprofits and Public Sector: The Latest Hot Market). While these leaders dominate the nonprofit market in a broader context—and no one is going after A-133s in any significant way at this time—this might change down the track. Point solutions like Deltek GovWin and CRM & Proposals might find their match in comparable solutions from providers like Adonix Inc., Map ROI Systems Inc., Input Inc., and others. Numerous project organizations have gotten used to manual "workarounds," and might still prefer the best-of-breed solutions they have in place—which might just be enough to represent a barrier for Deltek's all-encompassing offering.

Some of these competitors still have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and other resources than Deltek, not to mention a higher profile and recognition on a worldwide basis. Since they have begun to experience a deceleration in their core upper-market business, and have thus refocused their marketing and sales efforts towards the upper-middle market where Deltek actively markets its products, one should expect them to implement increasingly aggressive pricing programs. Furthermore, certain competitors, particularly Microsoft, SAP, Oracle, and Lawson, have well-established relationships with many Deltek customers (both current and prospective), and with major accounting and consulting firms which might have an incentive to recommend such competitors over Deltek. All these vendors, while possibly inferior regarding project-oriented, government-compliant, or service industries focus, will influence some purchase decisions by offering more comprehensive horizontal product portfolios and by touting a superior global presence and greater multinational product capabilities, which are still hurdles for Deltek. Still, comparisons to competitors need to be weighed with the understanding that no matter how large these competitors are, that they do not have the specific is industry focus and staff experience that Deltek does. Despite industry consolidation, Deltek remains a vendor that provides total solutions for project-oriented companies. There are really no competitors in the same space; either they are point solutions that compete in certain areas, or larger, non-project oriented vendors trying to tunnel down into this space.

But also, while Costpoint has long been very competitive with other major enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems with respect to features and capabilities for project-oriented businesses, the market has lately become more focused not only on the need for Web-based applications, but also on the need for intuitive role- and process-based user experiences (see Easy ERP: A Challenge to Conventional Thinking and Portals: Necessary But Not Self-sufficient). The lack of a fully Web-enabled system might for some time have hindered Deltek's potential growth objectives, and so the vendor has lately increased activity with respect to the Web-based development of Deltek Costpoint. Deltek believes that the realities of the market do not support the approach that the "best" solution is the one that is fully Web-based, based on the vast feedback from its customers. Deltek has chosen instead to build to the realities of the market and its customers, and the recent product developments reflect that pragmatic approach.

While the Web-enabled version is a great boost, the vendor needs to catch up with regard to developing portal-based solutions and user empowerment, especially in light of SAP's Mendocino and Microsoft's People-Ready recent initiatives (see Major Vendors Adapting to User Requirements). Each role in a service organization has a unique e-project perspective. For instance, while project managers often need full control (including the ability to change project projections), rank-and-file staff typically only need to be able to record billable project hours, and accounting needs only enough access to build the company cash flows from aggregate project data. However, all these constituencies increasingly want to accomplish these tasks from their familiar Microsoft Excel and Outlook workspaces, without the need to switch between office productivity solutions and the underlying enterprise applications. Deltek is developing a portal-based strategy, which was one of the reasons for the Welcom acquisition. Furthermore, Deltek Vision supports this type of Outlook integration, and the vendor will be releasing Excel-based interactive billing in the 5.0 product release.

Also, some prospects, especially from the commercial sector, may find Deltek's products too rigid and training-intensive, given that these products have had to abide by rigid regulatory requirements, and thus embed many features not required by commercial sector prospects. For example, while projects must be tracked and billed separately, and while services companies often need to run forecasts and what-if project scenarios (and to modify renegotiated total costs as a project evolves), they do not necessarily want to be encumbered with an additional set of stringent audit requirements for government contractors, which is Deltek's area of expertise. Some existing customers, especially of older Deltek products, might say that the system requires several rigid steps to create a purchase order, for example, or that it has only limited workflow and e-mail notification, meaning that it is still not possible to attach important documents in the database for other users to see and analyze via drill-downs. A notable exception would be Vision, which has extensive workflow capabilities and does not feature rigid regulatory requirements.

There might also be opportunity and need for Deltek to explore software as a service (SaaS) deployment opportunities for some applications. Pioneers in this regard are eProject and OpenAir in the project management arena, and a slew of competitors in the time and expense (T&E) sector. The ability to offer both on-demand and on-premise software in a near real-time synchronization mode is possibly the best overall solution to optimizing user access to applications. Deltek's readiness for this undertaking, however, remains to be seen. For more information on SaaS, see Software as a Service Is Gaining Ground.

Thus, Deltek faces the challenge of continued investment in redeveloping legacy systems or acquiring new vertically-astute technologies, while holding back on operating costs. This brings us to the burden of still outstanding research and development (R&D) work, which may prompt some observers to categorize Deltek's touted generous investment in R&D as making a virtue out of necessity. However, Deltek strongly believes that its specialization and focus equal "a price to be paid" in R&D, and that its R&D expenditure is not out of line with other top software vendors in the industry. This might even be considered impressive against a backdrop of supporting many products for up to twenty years and more since commercial release. It does not cost a lot of money to run these legacy systems and keep customers on them. That being the case, the vendor does not see the compelling need to move these customers off legacy solutions .

The picture becomes still more complex due to the fact that Deltek incorporates certain application software licensed from third parties into its software products (although most vendors, if not all, incorporate third party tools). In addition to attempting more market visibility and noise in its new target segments (as opposed to a largely word-of-mouth principle in the past), Deltek will have to further clarify its remaining hodgepodge of disparate technologies and solutions. Although it has grouped its offering within the three major branded groups of products, Deltek's offering still resembles an exotic and troublesome restaurant menu, where one has trouble guessing what goes well with what, and so on. Room for synergistic integration of staff members remains too, since some product specialists, while indisputably knowledgeable about their realm (timekeeping, say), do not necessarily have "big picture" knowledge of the entire Deltek portfolio. A mitigating fact is that certain products, such as FMS, Advantage, and Sema4 are no longer sold. Also, while one could argue that it would be "easier" for Deltek to have fewer offerings, after carefully reviewing and understanding the needs of the market, Deltek believes that its three flagship platforms offer the right mix.


SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/from-shoestring-budget-to-millions-the-road-ahead-for-an-enterprise-management-software-vendor-18628/

Outsourcing Security Part 1: Noting the Benefits

Introduction

Remember the carefree days of summer? The memories aren't so positive for many corporations hit by cyber attacks during the summer of 2001. Three especially menacing threats-CodeRed, CodeRed II, and Nimda-cost U.S. corporations more than 12.3 billion dollars. After the fall-out, one company reported it had over 60 software engineers working for a week to recover from Nimda, and it still had work to do.

For many organizations, these recent network security breeches, as well as cyber terrorism discussions in the wake of the September terrorist attacks, have served as a wake-up call regarding the need for information security. Without effective security, companies risk losing money and customer trust. With good security, companies have the power to maintain stakeholder value, customer loyalty, and competitive advantage.

The Internet and the big "E's": e-business, e-commerce, and e-retailing, contribute to today's necessity for a protected company network. Big-even small-holes can lead to formidable problems. Consequently, a bullet-proof security program is critical to an enterprise's survival. Whether this effective security management comes from an in-house or outsourced program is a decision that must be made within a corporation using only its best data.

As the first of a three-part series on managed security services, the following describes why many organizations are choosing to outsource management and monitoring of security systems.

This is Part 1 of a 3-part article.

Part 1 notes the benefits of outsourcing security.
Part 2 will evaluate the cost of such an outsourcing.
Part 3 will provide guidelines for selecting a security services provider

Open for Business

E-commerce and e-business initiatives inspire companies to move toward an open, distributed network-computing environment. These environments are designed to enable employees, customers, partners, suppliers, and distributors to exchange and access information critical to conducting business. Unfortunately, these same networked environments create vulnerabilities that allow disgruntled workers, hackers, and other types of attackers-both internal and external-to wreak havoc on corporate systems through malicious acts of fraud and vandalism.

With customers and business partners dependent on accessing critical product and service data via open networks such as the Internet, companies must ensure the integrity of this information or risk jeopardizing their reputation and brand equity. The need to protect the bottom line, as well as corporate image and customer trust, drives the demand to effectively manage information security.

Other situations challenge today's networked businesses:

* Rise in deliberate criminal behavior directed at corporations
Following the September 11 terrorist attacks, government attention has increased focus on legislation calling for stricter punishments for hackers. Even with this focus, recent studies find the rate of cyber attacks to be on the rise. Research also reveals that some industries are more often victimized than others. Specifically, the high-tech, financial services, media, and energy sectors experience the most frequent attacks.

* Growing mobile workforce
An increasingly mobile workforce, telecommuting, and remote computing create special security problems for companies. Enterprises are driven not only by the desire to protect their information and physical assets, but also by the need to ensure worker productivity. There is an increasing acceptance of worker mobility and remote computing, but traditional corporate LANs and WANs are insufficient to support this growing off-site work force. As remote access to corporate networks increases, so does the need to protect transmission of information to these remote points.

Surrounded by Obstacles

While security has never been so critical to the profitability of an enterprise, businesses face a number of barriers to achieving and maintaining in-house security programs.

* Shortage of qualified security professionals
IT personnel are short in supply. According to The Meta Group, businesses face a deficit of over 1 million IT professionals in the matter of a few years. Experienced information security professionals are even harder to find, expensive to hire, and difficult to retain due to extremely strong market demand. This contributes to a high attrition rate among security workers that can reduce a company's ability to effectively safeguard its valuable information assets.

* Insufficient resources and infrastructure to support 24x7 security
To provide around-the-clock security coverage, requirements are many: manpower and supporting hardware, as well as software and equipment to build, upgrade, maintain, operate, and control the systems. Companies often find these security necessities don't fit with limited corporate resources sanctioned to support the organization's primary business requirements.

* Rising complexity of security technology
Security for today's networks and information systems is more complex than a few years ago. The methods and technologies used by hackers grows more sophisticated each month. Particularly threatening are the devastating payloads of blended threats. After being planted, blended threats simultaneously search out a variety of vulnerabilities. Unlike a hacker who targets a specific application or entity, blended threats currently carry as many as four different ways of propagating themselves. Experts warn future blended threats may contain as many as 15 or 20 propagation methods.

* Lack of time to dedicate to security issues
Keeping pace with the latest protection strategies demands extensive time and training. For in-house professionals, tracking new cyber threats, vulnerabilities, hacker techniques, and security developments removes them from other mission-critical activities that provide higher return on investment.

Numerous organizations currently managing security in-house are looking for alternatives to overcome these obstacles. They want a way to maintain a strong security posture while focusing on core, revenue-generating e-business functions.

Outside the Box

For a growing number of organizations-large to small-outsourcing security tasks offers improved information protection by a seasoned team of experts in a cost-effective manner. According to a June 2000 survey by Hurwitz Group, as many as a quarter of companies with more than $10 billion in annual sales are using or considering handing over some of their security, such as firewalls, anti-virus software, virtual private networks, or intrusion detection, to a managed security service provider.

Analyst firm Gartner Dataquest states managed security services, defined as outsourced management and monitoring of security systems, is the fastest growing segment of the information security services market. "Managed Security Services Providers (MSSPs) use high-availability security operation centers (either from their own facilities or from data center providers) to support 24X7 services designed to reduce the number of operational security personnel an enterprise must hire, train, and retain to maintain an acceptable security posture."

For organizations facing the challenges of orchestrating in-house security, outsourced security represents a more effective alternative. Among other benefits, managed security offers the following:

* Maintenance of positive company reputation
By protecting critical assets from damage, theft and misuse, managed security services help organizations avoid negative publicity and reduce network downtime that can lead to diminished revenues and customer dissatisfaction.

* Freedom to focus on company growth
At the strategic level, managed security services can free organizations to focus their IT resources on strategic initiatives more central to core business priorities.

* Improved information protection
With the growing complexity and importance of today's networks and information systems, managed security services offer the concentration and components needed to provide a complete, impenetrable security management program.

The following table details comparisons between in-house and outsourced security.


SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/outsourcing-security-part-1-noting-the-benefits-16627/

Integrated and Process-oriented Solutions Are Required for Competitiveness Integrated solutions that optimize only at a company- or department-level

Event Summary

On May 8, Infinium Software (NASDAQ: INFM), a provider of Web-integrated enterprise business solutions, announced that Rampart Resort Management, operators of The Rampart Casino at the Resort at Summerlin and owner/operators of The Cannery Hotel and Casino, selected Infinium Financial Management, Human Resources, and Payroll solutions to support its ambitious expansion and growth strategies. In an effort to provide its patrons with a world-class gaming experience, Rampart Resort Management is investing $6 million in The Rampart Casino at the Resort at Summerlin to renovate the property to better serve its patrons, more than double its hotels convention space, and hire up to 150 people to join the casinos 310-person workforce in time for its "Grand Re-Opening" set for June, 2002.

In support of its ambitious expansion and growth strategies, Rampart Resort Management began to evaluate enterprise business solutions and reportedly narrowed their search to include: PeopleSoft, J.D. Edwards, and Infinium. Rampart Resort Management reportedly selected Infinium because of its long-established, in-depth understanding and commitment to the hospitality and gaming industry; its over 20 year commitment to the IBM iSeries (formerly AS/400) platform, which is regarded by many to offer strong platform reliability at the lowest total cost of ownership (TCO); its iSeries channel partnership with Computer Configuration Services (CCS); its competitive functionality, utilization of innovative technologies, rapid implementations, and outstanding customer service. Infinium's solutions are used at more than 60% of the Fortune 500 companies in the hospitality industry, approximately 90% of the hotels and casinos on the Las Vegas Strip, and 100% of the Fortune 500 companies in the gaming industry.

To illustrate its unrelenting commitment to the iSeries platform, on April 29, Infinium announced that it has signed IBM eServer iSeries channel partnership agreements with Computer Configuration Services (CCS); Dynamix Group; Essex Technology Group, Inc.; Inter-American Data, Inc. (IAD); Mainline Information Systems, Inc.; and Sirius Computer Solutions (SCS) to increase its revenues and grow its customer base. As part of Infinium's relationship with its new IBM iSeries channel partners, those partners' sales forces will become an extension of Infinium's direct sales force. Infinium and its iSeries channel partners will allocate internal resources to develop joint marketing programs that promote their respective offerings and enhance their awareness within targeted markets, generate sales leads, and ultimately, drive new business revenues. All of Infiniums iSeries channel partners were selected by Infinium based on several, specific criteria including: number of existing customers, number of U.S. sales representatives, geographical coverage, technical competence, and vertical market expertise, among others.

Further, in its endeavor to create another strong vertical industry awareness, on April 23, Infinium announced that Catholic Medical Center, a 330-bed full-service healthcare facility in Manchester, NH, selected Infinium's Financial Management and Materials Management solutions to streamline its non-clinical operations. As part of its strategic initiatives to reduce costs and enhance operating efficiencies, Catholic Medical Center reportedly began evaluating high return-on-value (ROV), low TOC enterprise business solutions and selected Infinium's solutions to streamline and automate its processes to reduce the time and money spent on its non-clinical operations, freeing those resources to focus on delivering the highest-quality of patient care. More than 100 healthcare organizations, ranging in size from 100 to 800-plus beds, reportedly rely on Infinium's solutions to help streamline their non-clinical business operations, reduce administrative costs, and maximize their capital and human resources. Infinium believes its solutions provide healthcare organizations with the ability to:

* Reduce administrative costs

* Streamline business processes and improve workflow

* Manage constant change

* Recruit, retain, and maximize the value of professional staff

* Ensure compliance with JCAHO (Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations), HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), and OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) 300 regulations

* Interface easily with leading insurance processing, medical practice, clinical information, and inventory and supply management solutions

To point out success in its third vertical industry of focus, on March 28, Infinium announced that Crest Foods Company, a process manufacturer with ingredient, consumer products and contract packaging divisions, enhances the efficiency and increases the productivity of its operations with Infinium's Process ERP solution. Infinium's integrated Process ERP solution, which includes: Process Manufacturing, Materials Management, Human Resources (HR), and Financial Management, streamlines Crest Foods operations, from formula to accounting, and unites everyone in its organization, from operations managers to the CFO. All departments, from human resources to shipping, reportedly operate from the same page, with the same updated information, creating administrative efficiencies from division to division and allowing for timely adjustments according to market demands and fluctuations.

For example, Infinium Advanced Planning helps Crest Foods production planners, schedulers, and buyers determine a time-phased production schedule and calculate the amount of critical resources needed to fulfill it on time. Thereafter, Crest Foods scheduled requirements are fed into Infinium Purchase Management and Manufacturing Control to automatically create purchase and production orders. Infinium Manufacturing Control helps Crest Foods maintain, update, and provide detailed, real-time information for production, including batch scheduling, instructions processing, and batch ticket and production order printing. Designed from the ground-up for formula-based process manufacturing operations, Infinium Process Manufacturing solution captures and reports in logical combinations all the cost resources, raw materials, labor, containers, machines, and burdens and might particularly be effective in environments like Crest Foods where the production process can change dramatically.

The above-espoused renewed focus resulted in improving financial performance according to Infinium's April 22 announcement of its financial results for the second quarter of fiscal year 2002 that ended March 31, 2002. Software license fees for Q2 2002 were $2.9 million, a 34% increase compared to $2.2 million for the previous quarter, and a 3% decline compared to $3.0 million for Q2 2001. Total revenues for Q2 2002 were $16.5 million, a 1% increase compared to $16.3 million for the previous quarter, and still a 13% decrease compared to $18.9 million for Q2 2001 (see Figure 1 below). However, net income for the quarter was $3.5 million including a $337,000 gain from the divestiture of a Netherlands subsidiary, compared to $2.7 million Q1 2002, and the net loss of $2.9 million the second quarter of the prior year. Also important, Infinium's cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance for Q2 2002 was $17.5 million, compared to $13.7 million for the previous quarter, and $15.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.

Figure 1:

This is Part 1 of a 2-part note on Infinium.

Part 2 continues the Market Impact and makes User Recommendations.

Market Impact

Infinium seems to be rebounding from hitting rock bottom during 2001 just when the market thought that it could not have been worse than 2000 (see Infinium Ends Its Most Challenging Year). Indeed, the last two years were not for the faint-hearted - Infinium saw crippling revenues, bloated losses, departures of almost the entire management team, and the first significant layoffs (20% of staff) in the company history. Particularly painful was Q4 2001, when its revenues all but vanished (see Figure 1 above) as the company wrote off its failed ASP (application solution provider) venture. Against this backdrop, the company's tenacity and ability to launch a comeback deserves praise.

While the company did not cry over spilled milk for long, it also did not pour ashes over its head for long either. The time to take stock of its of its competencies' and/or resources' had come. At the end of 2001, Infinium seems to have successfully bitten the bullet. Consequently, the fast tracked return to profitability during the last two quarters, a $3.8 million positive cash flow and revenue growth in the last quarter have renewed customers' and investors' confidence; the company has recently been reinstated into NASDAQ, and its recent stock performance seems to be on a fair way to create a decent market capitalization and to wipe off any remaining negative stock equity.

After close scrutiny and assessment of the company's strengths and weaknesses, the new management has concluded that Infinium's over two decades long operating history, its functional and scalable solutions, over $40 million of recurring service & maintenance revenue stream (out of $74 million total revenues in 2001), and loyal customer base (with over 90% customer retention) due to traditionally exceptional customer care should vouch for future success provided the company can curb challenges. Some of these, like a broken financial model, cash burning, and a 'revolving door' management have apparently been successfully addressed. The result is a renewed employees' and the market's enthusiasm to move forward.

Hard Decisions Produce Results

Infinium also had to make some gutsy and necessary business decisions. First one was the discontinuation of its ASP service and consequent closing of its costly investment - a spacious enterprise applications hosting center. The lack of traction which resulted in less than two dozen ASP customers forced the company to swallow a bitter pill and write off ~$10 million. As everyone is always wise after the event, many may castigate the company's failed decision at the time of ASP euphoria. Although it was an injudicious reaction to many analysts' overly optimistic predictions of outsourcing business, the company's ASP strategy to provide holistic, turnkey solution as to also obfuscate its IBM AS/400 platform confinement had some temptation and merit at the time. The fact is also that all of Infinium's ASP customers are reportedly still happy and referenceable Infinium customers. Many of them decided to go with traditional in-house implementations, while others decided to continue to outsource Infinium's applications at other ASP providers.

Incidentally, another crucial decision was the sole focus on iSeries platform and on IBM technology and infrastructure. It is a prudent decision against the backdrop of the company's recent business circumstances and its resources. While not a platform with a high growth potential, iSeries remains a proven technology that is highly regarded for its reliability, stability, and robustness, which all typically result with a low TCO. The fact that IBM continues to invest in the platform's development and its Web-integrated infrastructure was yet another reason for Infinium to stick to its long partner's recognized technology.

Having decided on its platform support, Infinium has energetically embarked on the mission to modernize its products architecturally while preserving its customers' investment in its older product releases. Its Web-integrated business applications framework has been laid out -- it features multi-tier (3-tier) architecture with applications/data services layer, Web/applications service layer, and client/presentation layer. It is based on commonly used Web standards such as XML, HTTP, Java/J2EE, and DHTML.

Furthermore, a brand new browser-based user interface (UI) should have an appeal to current users and prospects, and should alleviate Infinium's proverbial problem of bland user interface and unexciting product that has often plagued its sales in the past and prevented its more widespread recognition. Also, to alleviate anxiety of many of its users, which have heavily customized its older, 'green-screen' product versions, the company released in March a redevelopment tool designed to extend the business logic and interfaces of these product instances to the Internet. The tool uses XML to communicate with the IBM's WebSphere Application Server.

Infinium's Strengths

Infinium's enterprise business solutions include human resources (HR), payroll, financial management, customer relationship management (CRM), materials management, process manufacturing, and business intelligence (BI)/analytics offerings. While its product is not based on object oriented programming (OOP) code per se, it has nevertheless long provided a great number of application programming interfaces (APIs) for interconnectivity among its own and third-party applications, all providing for flexibility and incremental deployment. Infinium has therefore been quite competitive in speed of implementation, TCO, and price/performance ratio. Furthermore, as the company supports both IBM and Microsoft endorsed middleware standards, it is well poised for future technological developments and interconnectivity requirements.

Concurrently with interconnectivity and workflow enablement of its suite, Infinium has also developed strong back-office functionality, particularly human resources/payroll and financial management suites. Infinium Financial Management was devised to help organization streamline the entire financial management chain, from budgeting expenses, to recording transactions and forecasting revenue, and was designed with strong internal controls to ensure accuracy and compliance while inherent flexibility should provide the ability to grow and adapt to business change.

Its Web-integrated capabilities include rich reporting and analysis, and self-service options may empower organizations to work more efficiently. The suite includes the following modules: general ledger, accounts receivable, accounts payable, fixed assets, purchase management, project accounting, self service, global taxation, income reporting, and budgeting, while treasury management is offered through partnering.

Infinium Human Resources is a comprehensive HR/Payroll solution devised to enable organizations to manage and motivate their workforce, minimize administrative tasks, and empower HR to play a strategic role in their overall success. It is a Web-integrated solution with e-business capabilities, such as manager and employee self-service, and offers many HR-related functional requirements, from compensation and benefits management and in-depth employee training and career-path tracking features, to workforce management and critical line-manager empowerment. The suite offers the following modules: HR administration, payroll, benefits administration, manager and employee self-service, training administration, and recruiting management.

Infinium's ideal users are larger mid-market companies with a large number of employees, differing pay scales among a wide range of varying positions/job descriptions, and a need to adhere to union requirements, but that are also looking for a functional product without too much complexity that comes from Tier 1 product offerings. As an example, the HR product was designed with user self-sufficiency and a minimal training need in mind. To that end, on all screens users get a bird-eye view of the data pertinent to them, and a web-based intuitive UI makes user interaction more recreational than painful experience of e.g., enrollment, or changing data. Still, to keep the information cohesive and in check, HR managers are required by alerts to approve all updates/changes. Also, Infinium Corporate Performance Manager (CPM), powered by Cognos, ensures effective data utilization, as only the necessary data is used during any transaction or update, and is put into the appropriate business context. CPM helps also ensure that the business strategy is aligned with execution at all levels by linking people, information, and decision-making processes throughout an organization. It thereby enables the entire management cycle including: planning, forecasting, budgeting, reporting, analysis, and scorecarding.




SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/infinium-returns-to-its-core-competencies-to-succeed-part-1-recent-announcements-16665/

Business Process Management: A Crash Course on What It Entails and Why to Use It

Integrated and Process-oriented Solutions Are Required for Competitiveness

Integrated solutions that optimize only at a company- or department-level are no longer sufficient for success in today's highly competitive, integrated supply chain environment. Every department contains mountains of data, but without an integrated and process-oriented solution, all this valuable information is often lost to the company as a whole. What is needed is a real time solution that goes beyond integrating the content and processes of individual sales, marketing, or support department data.

Companies need a higher level of agility to respond to the different types of customer behaviors and over the last several years, cleaner, more reliable data has become the mantra of organizations seeking to improve their customer focus. As a result, user organizations are now swimming in improved data, which are still stored in disparate applications, data marts, operational data stores, and data warehouses. Companies have even attached sophisticated analytic tools to this scattered data with the hopes of gaining insight into customer attributes and behaviors (see Why Are CRM and Analytics Intrinsically Connected?). Despite these efforts, many companies have still failed to link data to business processes, and only a few companies have changed their business processes to reflect the insights gained from the data side. Even fewer have harvested this knowledge to make the most of every interaction with their customers.

Due to commoditization, a company that does not have a competitive product- or service may still be able to compete, if it has a nimble enterprise information system and process. The same holds for relationships with supplier on the other side of the supply chain, not to mention relationships with employees within the four walls of an organization.

Linking data and content to processes falls in the realm of business process management (BPM), a technology that coordinates the data and actions of disparate information technology (IT) systems and should allow companies to transform potentially damaging customer interactions into revenue opportunities. An ideal enterprise system in an ideal world would have a single software vendor providing 100 percent of the data, content, business processes, and connectivity to the outside world, and would accommodate changes instantaneously when required. However, this is a utopian ideal. Unfortunately in the real world, communication is impeded because content silos exist everywhere, and engineers, production, and sales people do not talk the "same language" and do not always use the same software.

Reality tends to fall short of ideal situations and processes on paper, because many issues can crop up at any time such as delays; "black holes", where information disappears; human errors; different context and semantics within different departments; and regulatory and compliance issues that must be addressed, etc. For example, it is not uncommon to see an invoice sent several days after the goods have been shipped. Thus, coordinating systems should help companies respond to key business events in real time (or close to it), and to minimize the risk of lost revenue. For example, a sales representative can contact and offer a customer discounts to pay bills on-line. Ultimately, by responding with the right action at the right time, companies can become real time enterprises (RTE).

BPM is a methodology backed by software used to manage businesses at a higher efficiency. It has emerged from the rising complexity of doing business in a competitive economy, where margins continue to narrow and the pressure to respond to market shifts is greater than ever. Companies are under increasing regulatory and investor scrutiny and must be run successfully, both in the short and long term.

A BPM high-level mission lets business processes become as manageable as data. To that end, BPM has to integrate existing applications, Web services, and people in a such way where it can quickly change, destruct, or construct processes, which is a capability that is far beyond the traditional enterprise application integration (EAI).

BPM: A Crash Course on What It Entails

As a nascent software category, BPM often means different things to different people. One could, in great part, blame this on the slew of budding pure-play software providers that refer to themselves as full-fledged BPM providers, but really only cover a niche or two of the entire BPM realm. One should also distinguish clearly between BPM as a management activity and BPM as a modeling tool, since these definitions are often used interchangeably. Below are the typical high-level tasks that a comprehensive BPM solution should cover (listed sequentially):

1. Process definition or modeling, which maps and defines business process;
2. process execution, which is a critical task that requires a core database and engine that contains process rules, and automatically initiates and manages processes;
3. process monitoring, which enables managers to see potential bottlenecks and monitor work in process (WIP);
4. integration layer, which, logically, links an organization's diverse business applications; and
5. user interface (UI), which enables people to interact with the process engine.

There is an ingrained belief that BPM is the enabler of agility; flexibility; increased competitiveness; compliance; actionable information sharing and collaboration; and workflow execution. To satisfy these assumptions, BPM software should be

* event-driven, since it is triggered by internal and external events;
* orchestrated, since predefined process flows must enable complex process steps that can be completed without human intervention;
* enable internal processes, inside the organization's firewall; and
* exchange process information with external user groups.

Further, despite the need for orchestration, a human-centric workflow is still necessary in many instances. Therefore, BPM should support both exception-based human interaction and human decision-making. And last but not least, business analytics in the system must enable real time business event processing through management dashboards and similar decision-making tools. BPM also often includes integration capabilities including extract, transformation, and load (ETL) tools, multi-channel integration, and support for enterprise mobility, though these are available through other functions.

Some pundits believe that the enterprise software world is being revolutionized by two big complementary developments: service oriented architecture (SOA), and event driven architecture (EDA). SOA is a formalized approach for managing Web services, which means that some kind of platform is needed to orchestrate how services interact, and to ensure that processes are auditable, flexible, scalable, and secure (see Understanding SOA, Web Services, BPM, BPEL, and More). On the other hand, EDA is about giving applications the ability to handle unexpected events and events that occur in conjunction with others. Full-fledged BPM systems exhibit many of the same functions on both sides (see The Future of Business Process Management Where is BPM heading?).

Moreover, business processes should by no means be viewed within the confines of departmental or even organizational boundaries, as businesses are becoming increasingly horizontal in terms of cross-departments (not to be confused with a vertical industry focus, which remains paramount) and role-based. Therefore, what is needed is an enterprise system with holistic, "big picture" answers for the entire enterprise, if not the entire supply chain. Basic questions like "What is the profit per product line?", "What is our current sales pipeline and how does that compare to last year?", and "Who are our most profitable customers?" need to be answered. With BPM-enabled and integrated solutions, these answers might come naturally, since BPM aims to formalize intricate business processes into highly manageable and visible workflows.

These processes already exist, but vary from department to department, by function, and as well as in their requirements to interact with various software products and business partners. This creates a management and training burden, stymies attempts at holistic reporting across the business, and often results in the duplication of information handling as the information moves from one department to the next.

Conversely, BPM forces common business process methodology across the enterprise, and if everyone uses the same system, a commonality occurs that should considerably reduce training requirements, simplify compliance efforts, and enhance internal communications. Duplication can also be eliminated because everything is under the same system, and in cases where information must exist in duplicate form, the BPM-enabled system can be configured to replicate it.

BPM: Why Use It?

Why anyone would want to consider deploying BPM? Some reasons include the potential to dramatically reduced operation costs, reduced lead times, streamlined outsourcing, improved performance visibility, better management of global operations, faster time-to-market, exceeded customer expectations, and so on. The Business Project Management Institute reports that an effective BPM strategy can

* reduce product design time by 50 percent, resulting in faster time-to-market, more competitive products, and increased revenue;
* reduce order time by 80 percent, leading to cost savings, improved customer satisfaction, and revenue gains; and
* help organizations achieve efficiency gains of 60 percent in call centers, resulting in improved asset management, reduced customer service costs, and improved customer satisfaction.

An Accenture report claims that a BPM-enabled enterprise resource planning (ERP) system can cut inquiry response time by 70 to 90 percent, decrease customer order lead time by 50 percent, increase inventory turns by 35 percent, and cut manufacturing cycle time by 40 percent.

An added benefit of BPM (combined with analytics) is that it can improve compliance with initiatives such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). In particular, the sheer number of provisions contained within the legislation is daunting, and although it is possible to use checklists and spreadsheets to achieve compliance with all of SOX mandates, most companies recognize that specialized software and systems can streamline the process of tracking tasks and managing the overall process (see Attributes of Sarbanes-Oxley Tool Sets). To that end, BPM technology should improve management control by automating processes and enforcing business policies. Management dashboards also assist executives in spotting problems earlier, through greater visibility of critical business information.

In the past, tweaking a current ERP system to simplify a job would have customarily involved costly custom programming. Today, BPM can streamline business processes within and between systems, because it is a mix of workflow, EAI, and application development that makes it easier for companies to codify current processes, automate their execution, monitor performance, and make "on-the-fly" adjustments to improve the processes.

BPM Cautions and Caveats

We do not necessarily see BPM as a significant enabler for reinventing mature, "cut-and-dry" ERP or computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) processes, particularly not in a single-site environment (although it remains important to automate and keep these routine processes in check). Indeed, how many ways can one think of to pay vendors, create invoices, book debits and credits, or schedule maintenance? However, with respect to more "extrovert" collaborative applications like supply chain management (SCM), product lifecycle management (PLM), and customer relationship management (CRM), it is important to be able to model the application exactly to how an organization does business with its trading partners, and not be constrained by software. The need for SOA, Web services, and BPM has been boosted by these external processes, which are most often automated workflows that involve multiple companies and a diverse, existing enterprise systems.

The still emerging BPM market has resulted in a number of point solutions that excel in only a few of the aforementioned components of BPM. Therefore, following the same route as ERP players in the older ERP market, niche BPM vendors will have to partner to deliver a more comprehensive BPM solution, and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and market consolidation are bound to happen in the future.

In addition, though BPM vendors come from different backgrounds, and they can basically fall into three groups, each having typical strengths and weaknesses. These groups include traditional enterprise application vendors; enterprise content management (ECM) or infrastructure/EAI vendors, such as IBM, Tibco, Stellent, FileNet, SeeBeyond, and WebMethods; and BPM pure-play specialist vendors like Fuego, Savvion, Ultimus, IDS Scheer, and Pegasytems.

The first group appears in every software category related to process and consists of traditional enterprise applications vendors, such as Oracle, SAP, or Microsoft. Owing to their expertise in enterprise-wide business processes, these vendors have typical strengths, such as astute offerings for initial software releases and tight integration with (their own) ERP systems; good control and risk documentation; and good reporting and monitoring tools. A typical weakness of these vendors' solutions is that they have entered the market late, and consequently have had less time to mature, and offer poorer integration with existing document and records management systems.

Exact Software could also be categorized with the traditional enterprise vendors, although it does display some of the best traits from all three worlds. Namely, though it lacks modeling, the Exact e-Synergy product exhibits the typical strengths of a BPM or ECM offering. For example, it offers collaboration, document management, and records management functions, and Exact has a good track record of BPM implementations. Furthermore, the product has certainly not been late coming to market (on the contrary, it has been abreast, if not ahead, of the curve), and has been maturing ever since. Below is a summary of the benefits e-Synergy users have experienced.

* Improved consistency, as fewer issues are inadvertently overlooked and everyone is operating with the same information to achieve a common end;
* lower training costs for new staff;
* paperless office is possible, if desired;
* increased productivity;
* continuous process improvement, as one can tweak processes as needed, and institute lean concepts even in white collar, "ivory tower" environments; and
* reduced organizational stress and frustrations, by preventing many errors and resolving exceptions that typically fester unnoticed.

SoftBrands evolution is another extended-ERP product worth pointing out. In contrast to many complete peer ERP systems sold in a standardized form, evolution is designed to allow customers to customize the system to their own unique operations. It offers a wide range of functionality and tools that can tailor the application, and evolution provides businesses with a platform for business process improvement and growth. Having been built on SOA principles, and by using BPM tools to model, design, configure, and implement user enterprises' unique functional requirements, the product allows customers to tailor the application without modifying underlying source code.

A great example of a vendor within the pure service industry, is Unit 4 Agresso, a fellow Dutch competitor of Exact. Pure service sectors, such as professional services or local governments, offer "know-how" based products rather physical goods. Unit 4 Agresso's architecture is quite malleable, largely because the solution was, from the onset, designed to drive business from the top down, and uses business goals to shape business processes.





SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/business-process-management-a-crash-course-on-what-it-entails-and-why-to-use-it-18301/
hit counter